Black and White View - Abortion

While I was helping an author write in his new book, one chapter of his manuscript brought forth Margaret Sanger and the birth and direction of said movement.  Through the editing of selected chapters of "Eradicate" from David Fiorazo (Fe o ra zo), what I learned from this review of the beginnings of Mrs. Sanger and how it evolved into today's Planned Parenthood is astonishing.
 
To place this in perspective for me, I had no idea of any of this when I went to public school, and why should it?  Not until 2012 did I begin new revelation in retrospect of one person's vision into a billion dollar industry.  Now that there is a doctor who went to great lengths to murder babies even after birth has not made a ping in most liberal media.  The reason is simple: it goes against their lifestyle and very nature.
 
Margaret was born in a fairly large family, and later came to realization that her mother's death from tuberculosis was brought on by having too many children.  Eventually, she began believing in eugenics, which in her eyes was ridding those who are unfit to live, unfit to have more children, simply, to control the population. 

Her beginning of these views started with the simple foundation of birth control.  Seeing large families while in poverty only fueled her passion to see more of her belief come true.  She slowly began to change her viewpoint in her public writings to involve those who are physically and mentally challenged.  Soon she began to believe in the racial atmosphere, including blacks and immigrants.  This principle began to take affect in Indiana, where eugenics were being performed on mental institutions.  It soon was going on in seventeen others states during the 1930s.

Please note the Nazi extermination of the Jews did not technically start until 1934, the United States was first in performing eugenics.  If you think there is no connection between Margaret Sanger and Adolf Hitler, you have either not done your studies and decided ignorance is bliss.  Please note this transcript from the following website (http://www.spectacle.org/997/richmond.htmlhttp://www.spectacle.org/997/richmond.html)

Ernst Rudin was director of the foremost German eugenics research institute (Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Genealogy, in Munich, Germany). "On June 2, 1933, [German] Reich Interior Minister Wilhelm Frick announced the formation of an Expert Committee on Questions of Population and Racial Policy .... to plan the course of Nazi racial policy. The committee brought together the elite of Nazi racial theory: Alfred Ploetz, ..... Ernst Rudin, director of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Genealogy in Munich;...." (4) On July 14, 1933 this committee's recommendations were made law, the sterilization law ("Law for the Prevention of Genetically Diseased Offspring"); the start date for exercising the law was 1 Jan 1934. What was Ernst Rudin's opinion of Adolf Hitler and eugenics ('racial hygiene')?:
Academic William H. Tucker (The Science and Politics of Racial Research, 1994, University of Illinois Press) tells us about Ernst Rudin (p. 121):

In an address to the German Society for Rassenhygiene [Race-hygiene] Ernst Rudin, a professor of psychiatry who was one of the organization's original members and now its head, recalled the early, fruitless days when the racial hygienists had labored in vain to alert the public to special value of the Nordic race as "culture creators" and the danger of "unnatural" attempts to preserve the health of heredity defectives. Now Rassenhygiene [Race-hygiene] was finally receiving the attention it deserved, and Rudin virtually slavered over the man whose efforts produced this change: "The significance of Rassenhygiene did not become evident to all aware Germans until the political activity of Adolf Hitler and only through his work has our 30 year long dream of translating Rassen- hygiene into action finally become a reality." Terming it a "duty of honor" (Ehrenpflicht) for the society to aid in implementing Hitler's program, Rudin proclaimed, "We can hardly express our efforts more plainly or appropriately than in the words of the Fuhrer: 'Whoever is not physically or mentally fit must not pass on his defects to his children. The state must take care that only the fit produce children. Conversely, it must be regarded as reprehensible to withhold healthy children from the state.' (E. Rudin, "Aufgaben and Ziele der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Rassenhygiene," Archiv Fur Rassen- und Gesellschafts- biologie 28 (1934): 228-29

Mr. Rubin has visited Mrs. Sanger and began to endorse her views.  First, her principle was taken in full destruction with German hospitals and institutions, in lieu of Hitler's progress to the master race and returned dominance of Germany.  In only a few years, Germany easily "outproduced" in the eugenics department, later using this same against those the hatred Hitler and Nazi Party had for the Jews. 
Another person adding to her endorsement of eugenics is Lorthrop Stoddard. He took the simplistic view of eugenics, birth control and the Germanic politics of weeding out the worst and strengthening the strong, and used these bonds between Sanger and Hitler to interact and enhance both views. Indirectly, Margaret Sanger was responsible for the Holocaust and an estimated half million in hospitals and mental wards. 
That is NOTHING compared to what the United States continue to do makes the Nazi propaganda look like peanuts.  Once the connection of the German genocide was made known throughout the United States, Mr. Stoddard, the Board of Directors, and Mrs. Sanger saw the need to change the name to better mask their intention.  Today it is known as Planned Parenthood. 

We have abortions estimated around one every 95 seconds.  There has been other mass killings that are not made known through public school teachings, and usually can be found in thorough research on the internet and library, but much of this information is being ignored.  The answer is basically to avoid the product of socialism, communism, liberalism and the links they all have.

Liberal viewpoints level Mrs. Sanger as a hero, a patriot that liberated women from just child bearing machines to those who are "pro-choice."  As females she felt the power for population control and rid the world if deformed humans by showing them they had the will, not the men.  She wanted the decision of the men to be a no factor, that all decision of child bearing belong to the women.  Even those with what she deemed problems. 

Few facts about Margaret that only those who have studied deeply into her life now about:

• Both her marriages were to rich men and her agenda was to spend THEIR money to advance it.  Just before her death, she spent the rest of her second husbands fortune, and made sure the family connection would be with PP.  A grandson is now head of the abortion factory.
• Because of the Comstock Law that was in effect, Mrs. Sanger fled the country in fear of jail time.  She later returned when the Comstock Law was no longer effective.
• She believed in segregation, wanting those of other races not Caucasian to be put on separated lands, and monitored all their lives.
• Sterilization of those with incurable diseases, including epileptics, mental (i.e. Down Syndrome), and those classified as morons.

Much more is on website that I listed about of her points that she presented to President Woodrow Wilson.  Do not take Mr. Wilson lightly, his view of liberalism in the form of Democratic policies were far more left than America has been taught.  The only struggle that was more present was the war in Europe that began World War I and his isolationism that unfortunately failed.  Only through progressive and constant changing stances through cultural times has brought it to where it is today. 

Planned Parenthood and pro-choice are synonymous in liberal politics.  The argument really became legitimate when Roe vs. Wade court decision made abortion a federal position.  Once the federal government showed the stated money, Planned Parenthood took clinics around the nation, mostly around big cities where racial minorities lived in poor neighborhoods. 

I remember hearing of a statement that follows suit with the above paragraph, and it was made by a liberal by the name of Juan Williams.  He did some research and I believe what he saw astonished him, and he felt he needed to share it.  What was said on the radio (I believe I heard this on the Jerry Bader Show on Green Bay radio) was that 72% of all babies born in black neighborhoods are OUT OF WEDLOCK.  The question I am about to ask is unique in the compliance that many blacks DON'T believe in abortion, yet, these clinics are more prominent in their neighborhood.  What would the percentage be if these abortion mills WEREN'T where they are now?

Now for the conservative view, more importantly, from God's eyes.  life begins at conception.  Heartbeat is soon as six to eight weeks upon conception.  Sad that people see a child as an inconvenience, and obstruction to their lives.  Ironically, there are couples who cannot conceive by natural means and would love to have a child they can call their own and raise.  But mankind chooses to feed the god Malech to substantiate pro-choice. 

Now that liberals have moved forward from opposing Christianity and pro-life, its next agenda is to rid any legal and moral view that stands against their view.  It no longer matters of other's choices as they claim it should be, it has become "our highway" is the only highway.  With this power in their eyes, they will usher in the Great Tribulation with greater urgency in each passing day.  No matter how the child was conceived out of wedlock, God sees life as valuable to the point where He gave His Son for it.  These children should not be punished with death, they deserve life as much as the two who entwined in sex. 

The difference is those who are choosing death over an innocent as correction of a mistake, even though these people should have cared of the possibility of conception.  Sex is now used as a right and not a privilege God has given, to be"fruitful and multiply."  Please note the first part FRUITFUL - it means to bear good fruit, in essence, so this fruit can be passed on the children.  With no morals but your own choice, what will be left to the next generation?

Billy Graham said it best:
If God does not judge America (for her abortion, among others), then He would have to apologize for Sodom and Gomorrah. 
America makes those two cities look like choir boys, and we ask God to bless us.  Just in this week alone, President Obama made a grave error where he asked God (if he is speaking of the God if Israel) to bless Planned Parenthood.  Considering we have a President who views abortion as a right, even after a birth, and then tries to promote gun control for the "safety of the children."  I guess that only applies that don't get aborted.

Last question to ponder for all who read this:  How long before God makes a judgment upon this country, and why is only a few standing against this murder?  Worse, some endorse this while calling Jesus Lord.  Is the one of the reasons why Jesus said unless the days be shortened...

Jeremiah 9:24

Michael